![]() A project that is actively pursuing a badge is probably maintained. If the project does not produce software, choose "not applicable" (N/A).Īs a minimum, the project should attempt to respond to significant problem and vulnerability reports. Merely having comments in implementation code is not sufficient to satisfy this criterion there needs to be an easy way to see the information without reading through all the source code. Code interface documentation MAY be generated using tools such as JSDoc (JavaScript), ESDoc (JavaScript), pydoc (Python), devtools (R), pkgdown (R), and Doxygen (many). Documentation of a REST interface may be generated using Swagger/OpenAPI. Documentation MAY be automatically generated (where practical this is often the best way to do so). The project MAY use hypertext links to non-project material as documentation. In many cases it's best if most of this documentation is automatically generated, so that this documentation stays synchronized with the software as it changes, but this isn't required. If it is a command-line interface, document the parameters and options it supports. If it is a web application, define its URL interface (often its REST interface). If it is a library, document the major classes/types and methods/functions that can be called. This would include its application program interface (API) if the software has one. The documentation of an external interface explains to an end-user or developer how to use it. We encourage including machine-readable license information in generated formats where practical. Similarly, when creating a Debian package, you may put a link in the copyright file to the license text in /usr/share/common-licenses, and exclude the license file from the created package (e.g., by deleting the file after calling dh_auto_install). ![]() For example, when generating an R package for the Comprehensive R Archive Network (CRAN), follow standard CRAN practice: if the license is a standard license, use the standard short license specification (to avoid installing yet another copy of the text) and list the LICENSE file in an exclusion file such as. You do NOT need to include the license file when generating something from the source code (such as an executable, package, or container). Note that this criterion is only a requirement on the source repository. An alternative convention is to have a directory named LICENSES containing license file(s) these files are typically named as their SPDX license identifier followed by an appropriate file extension, as described in the REUSE Specification. One convention is posting the license as a top-level file named LICENSE or COPYING, which MAY be followed by an extension such as ".txt" or ".md". If this is your project, please show your badge status on your project page! The badge status looks like this: We gladly provide the information in several locales, however, if there is any conflict or inconsistency between the translations, the English version is the authoritative version. Feedback is welcome via the GitHub site as issues or pull requests There is also a mailing list for general discussion. If you want to enter justification text as a generic comment, instead of being a rationale that the situation is acceptable, start the text block with '//' followed by a space. ![]() To earn a badge, all MUST and MUST NOT criteria must be met, all SHOULD criteria must be met OR be unmet with justification, and all SUGGESTED criteria must be met OR unmet (we want them considered at least). For example, some practices enable multi-person review before release, which can both help find otherwise hard-to-find technical vulnerabilities and help build trust and a desire for repeated interaction among developers from different companies. ![]() However, following best practices can help improve the results of projects. Nor is there any set of practices that can guarantee that a project will sustain a healthy and well-functioning development community. There is no set of practices that can guarantee that software will never have defects or vulnerabilities even formal methods can fail if the specifications or assumptions are wrong. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |